{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002179929,0.0001152345,0.0004681844,0.00008129724,0.0001321417,0.000001497715,0.000877345,0.0001176413,0.00008642425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002258746,0.00007462477,0.0004644046,0.00007674038,0.004221408,0.0001451362,0.00006497461,0.0003983993,0.000002525012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006805598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002937044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004510433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006261407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974966,0.0008503337,0.0007248505,0.0001022093,0.0006098621,0.0002161114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961259,0.001281437,0.001749715,0.0003308305,0.0004178146,0.00009428045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431951,0.00007424144,0.0001819871,0.0000281639,0.00006839263,0.000001120612,0.004450724,0.00001298659,0.0008189205,0.9931808,0.000754883,0.0002846562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003608535,0.0001668124,0.001772692,0.0002003463,0.00007049391,0.000003394812,0.0001716747,0.00000593297,0.0006023092,0.9151855,0.08137823,0.00008178082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1427245,0.01377448,0.0001091798,0.004121366,0.003473681,0.0001821399,0.000007850379,0.000009423083,0.8355973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978151,0.000177842,0.0001515011,0.0002198967,0.0007166348,6.922672e-7,7.074323e-8,0.000009369041,0.0009089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}