{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006691935,0.0005110345,0.0006609153,0.001346175,0.005700332,0.008720069,0.001641263,0.005411035,0.007594296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01239213,0.000377415,0.0005207679,0.001312759,0.04605042,0.01810647,0.004988209,0.009767407,0.0008399908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008046269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005689609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004445549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003690468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953989,0.003024513,0.00009825596,0.0004886345,0.0007186343,0.000271102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847,0.008750078,0.0004599425,0.001022946,0.0008093814,0.0004876579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003319612,0.000002816276,0.00004470992,0.00001766005,0.000001213462,0.0000221154,0.001536767,0.00006022284,0.00001472126,0.995204,0.001745296,0.001347202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006034735,0.000005072804,0.00006996001,0.00006037041,0.000001453764,0.00003879028,0.0007890612,0.0002316087,0.00002009998,0.9380202,0.06075241,0.000004877532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02367125,0.0570146,0.03886371,0.4949842,0.00370856,0.00004808773,0.0001250226,0.000115854,0.3814687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857146,0.02262173,0.01393912,0.02663734,0.008875298,0.0001567055,0.00009049476,0.0001710759,0.04179369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008720069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05838007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}