{"id":"W2070691432","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2015.02.005","title":"Effective designs based on individual word length patterns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Aliasing; Fractional factorial design; Column (typography); Rank (graph theory); Measure (data warehouse); Design of experiments; Factorial experiment; Word length; Plackett–Burman design; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00482532,0.0001504493,0.0003823413,0.0002633731,0.00007327295,0.0003025809,0.0003436382,0.00006961795,0.00009701118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01493489,0.00009844595,0.00004215052,0.0002020484,0.0001403296,0.0002823422,0.00006015896,0.0004098937,0.00002453006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004629794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001464362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007367932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.486609e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967365,0.0007769287,0.0006013429,0.0002246428,0.001449078,0.0002114687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873623,0.01138329,0.0003497194,0.0001428511,0.0003373804,0.0004244825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003146578,0.000629703,0.3132693,0.000024684,0.000113185,0.001142401,0.005751461,0.01444449,0.001205561,0.01185175,0.01765089,0.63077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004296737,0.01321384,0.7902703,0.0006771914,0.000102466,0.0001934399,0.004293519,0.08767968,0.002866744,0.09420422,0.001494026,0.0007078895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1253701,0.00009176569,0.8727668,0.00009289006,0.0002604085,0.00008189957,0.00005209087,0.000007751746,0.001276322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839284,0.000001461625,0.1157038,0.0002667627,0.00007214115,0.000002190947,0.000001588482,0.00000670851,0.00001698302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7585582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3239244489964962,"score_gpt":0.4980734602817696,"score_spread":0.1741490112852734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}