{"id":"W2070751507","doi":"10.1108/17410400610710206","title":"A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Aerospace; Kaizen; Documentation; Originality; Benchmarking; Quality management; Process management; Competitive advantage; Variety (cybernetics); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Six Sigma; Business; Engineering management; Operations management; Marketing; Lean manufacturing; Service (business); Engineering; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045583,0.0004717206,0.0003452591,0.001904374,0.002228103,0.002895273,0.001047146,0.0008779922,0.001583778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007556462,0.0002737945,0.000516195,0.001971424,0.001385791,0.002037519,0.001594363,0.0009184238,0.0003105572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003127238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01013752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002385273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003784957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846804,0.008508363,0.0007345433,0.001241951,0.004335302,0.0004995071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899051,0.004017506,0.0009759692,0.0009754406,0.003517843,0.0006080296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001911546,0.001141902,0.01308619,0.0010755,0.00008857081,0.00162208,0.03186417,0.01108686,0.02319623,0.04317225,0.005312888,0.8681622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006085463,0.01485629,0.08371961,0.003045532,0.0006176245,0.005855325,0.08931816,0.1023384,0.09088609,0.0629594,0.5451781,0.0006168987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3176185,0.001194406,0.6282848,0.003492918,0.0001219102,0.002696864,0.0001638361,0.001030338,0.0453965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5044518,0.0004191495,0.4874701,0.000317218,0.00002310004,0.001039734,0.0001524466,0.00004768602,0.006078759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01045583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05529636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02528021517891809,"score_gpt":0.2683288160045074,"score_spread":0.2430486008255893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}