{"id":"W2071080626","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.02250.x","title":"REEXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BODY SIZE AND TONAL SIGNALS FREQUENCY IN WHALES: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH USING A NOVEL PHYLOGENY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Mammal Science","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Variation (astronomy); Frequency distribution; Similarity (geometry); Phylogenetic comparative methods; Statistics; Evolutionary biology; Cetacea; Bioacoustics; Whale; Zoology; Mathematics; Ecology; Acoustics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00389215,0.0002022324,0.0002481257,0.00006548772,0.0006285638,0.00009452557,0.0005947842,0.00004694477,0.0002357596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007338588,0.0001509627,0.00003356228,0.001616332,0.001451557,0.0004262883,0.001882581,0.0002886849,0.00001803435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003317396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003756949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007109406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003141489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976551,0.00007567038,0.0003910597,0.0005977646,0.0006678774,0.0006125465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.001227482,0.0001484945,0.0002461672,0.00001992347,0.0001427958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001043661,0.00004305894,0.9909382,0.000007629322,0.000003414174,0.00000382378,0.0006713434,0.0001613585,0.005350885,0.001079839,0.000004276157,0.001725724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002371617,0.00005976839,0.995557,0.00001479035,0.00001094063,0.00001975975,0.0004714752,0.002260958,0.00008697445,0.0009706014,0.0001136545,0.0001969286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304551,0.00003831345,0.002207816,0.00007161406,0.00002414786,0.000349183,0.00000295212,0.00001729238,0.06683353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806455,0.000002893921,0.01903324,0.0001319699,0.00005820642,0.00001128766,0.000001215889,0.000007374835,0.0001082688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06672526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1184414911095253,"score_gpt":0.3196501131245402,"score_spread":0.2012086220150149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}