{"id":"W2071452805","doi":"10.1080/13658816.2013.818151","title":"Toward a kinetic-based probabilistic time geography","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Geographical Information Systems","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Time geography; Probabilistic logic; Movement (music); Random walk; Skewness; Geography; Set (abstract data type); Distribution (mathematics); Probability density function; Spacetime; Kinematics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Statistics; Human geography; Physics; Economic geography; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009800766,0.0001139609,0.000218353,0.0006050068,0.0001129624,0.0006272644,0.0006845133,0.0001231205,0.0005408292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002524282,0.00009185314,0.0002778191,0.0004057291,0.0002754577,0.002254586,0.00001674727,0.0002145307,0.0001691734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006781095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001875811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001622118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971892,0.0001260736,0.001035549,0.00007862673,0.001358571,0.0002119589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963186,0.0001509033,0.0006885543,0.0001046411,0.00252193,0.0002153053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003506668,0.0007496199,0.9240832,0.0002123682,0.0007688063,0.00002299381,0.006979787,0.005222565,0.0001390719,0.03130497,0.01025397,0.01991194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003028206,0.000352203,0.7330977,0.000505237,0.0001071947,0.00003083369,0.002637137,0.007388973,0.00004686589,0.007289676,0.2448352,0.0006807186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607045,0.0002165349,0.009668271,0.00602113,0.003181108,0.0008657619,0.00004102607,0.0001097142,0.01919194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998929,0.00001446593,0.0002563695,0.000323517,0.0003937728,0.00002037353,0.00002218487,0.000004260639,0.00003606765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2345812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6048725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01471835793867431,"score_gpt":0.2671261820277112,"score_spread":0.2524078240890368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}