{"id":"W2071615258","doi":"10.1007/bf02873143","title":"The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints, diversity and development capacity of China","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geographical Sciences","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Sustainable development; China; Sustainability; Footprint; Ecological deficit; Diversity (politics); Carrying capacity; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008788962,0.0004487701,0.0004253511,0.003914578,0.000530421,0.0008973966,0.0007383206,0.0002836796,0.0009006599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001646514,0.0002852619,0.0006933332,0.004633932,0.0004873352,0.001022773,0.0006853748,0.0002098087,0.0000765661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002844719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003082719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1085332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06656401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997132,0.0000604109,0.000025997,0.00006197576,0.00008545292,0.00005291072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992835,0.0002881733,0.00008226075,0.00009402091,0.0001667339,0.00008529206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002004829,0.0001171982,0.6090825,0.0001928301,0.0004330096,0.0003860423,0.0007556539,0.2897567,0.002053924,0.01429896,0.001496743,0.08122595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002590926,0.0000538766,0.5643336,0.00002153923,0.0001528917,0.0001085267,0.0006182594,0.4231174,0.001221224,0.00781662,0.002475861,0.00005432517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926926,0.0002062703,0.004538974,0.00005876669,0.000004058484,0.00001776177,0.0006948213,0.0000317047,0.001755063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974942,0.00008642962,0.001514686,0.000003528019,0.0000026368,0.00001687603,0.0005562965,0.000005760247,0.0003196105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01822728909152754,"score_gpt":0.2216817328705613,"score_spread":0.2034544437790337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}