{"id":"W2071615258","doi":"10.1007/bf02873143","title":"The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints, diversity and development capacity of China","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geographical Sciences","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Sustainable development; China; Sustainability; Footprint; Ecological deficit; Diversity (politics); Carrying capacity; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003320536,0.00005715799,0.0002647506,0.000101775,0.0007787541,0.00001640784,0.0001742477,0.00005284529,0.00009442402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004248316,0.00002922904,0.0001148673,0.00114767,0.001550943,0.0000969746,0.000246178,0.00008378791,1.222706e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000313111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000104322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003305449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004952731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987387,0.000184671,0.0003826716,0.0001313696,0.0004260185,0.0001365871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991976,0.0002873244,0.0003323753,0.00005620415,0.00003385071,0.00009261384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006998513,0.00006281544,0.9963817,0.000003474796,0.00009174254,5.383595e-7,0.0002623361,0.0009950196,0.00005484985,0.0006267737,0.000001201118,0.001512572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007147829,0.0001394513,0.9966866,0.000002425091,0.0001164504,0.000003040961,0.0003789997,0.0004383142,0.00005337792,0.001895254,0.0001762546,0.00003840225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992326,0.00007138823,0.0002997366,0.0001370231,0.0000176505,0.00004431805,3.854695e-7,0.000001041879,0.0001957926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991785,0.00006838518,0.0007375417,0.000009215876,0.000001966578,3.91693e-7,5.107657e-8,3.82809e-7,0.00000354388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002895704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01822728909152754,"score_gpt":0.2216817328705613,"score_spread":0.2034544437790337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}