{"id":"W2071697652","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.004","title":"Threshold strategy-proofness: on manipulability in large voting problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Lipschitz continuity; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031884,0.0002112199,0.0004604377,0.0001568867,0.00009442726,0.0001156614,0.0001732339,0.0001406098,0.0002053769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001488444,0.0002387743,0.00008613981,0.00006341955,0.00005522616,0.0002291949,0.00005682049,0.0002244205,0.0004332067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001868603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006730456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.0000138713,0.000738078,0.0006022465,0.00001712615,0.0004326625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.00002226345,0.0002491751,0.0003033928,0.000005913143,0.0000879872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355943,0.0002073438,0.5668325,0.00005033048,0.000008566271,0.000005844313,0.0004360154,0.002011354,0.00001292188,0.4294338,0.000007515047,0.0009802666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003013894,0.000283116,0.9196818,0.0001370065,0.00001294796,0.0000251195,0.0005913301,0.001510444,0.00009910041,0.07272188,0.001174089,0.000749286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935173,0.0004802103,0.00006675977,0.0001214706,0.0003480287,0.0004491089,0.00008622419,0.00004865819,0.004882206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993363,0.00002941326,0.00003198029,0.00006653288,0.00009263915,0.0001059232,0.0000107934,0.00002857398,0.0002978465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05071341917895347,"score_gpt":0.2480091257612168,"score_spread":0.1972957065822634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}