{"id":"W2071708073","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.006","title":"Scientific reporting is suboptimal for aspects that characterize genetic risk prediction studies: a review of published articles based on the Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies statement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Predictive modelling; Computer science; Risk assessment; Identification (biology); Transparency (behavior); Data extraction; Medicine; MEDLINE; Actuarial science; Data mining; Statistics; Machine learning; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1103099,0.001176301,0.004016646,0.01179878,0.0009854101,0.006228185,0.003401119,0.004498514,0.00413702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2819979,0.0008065174,0.002937222,0.01162754,0.004092493,0.006494558,0.003133164,0.00419921,0.001297352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002939627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01147927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002854582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9245421,0.02629342,0.02735842,0.004475601,0.01632521,0.001005274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4672439,0.4150261,0.05654037,0.00795815,0.0513432,0.001888196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005345204,0.00004958137,0.00434499,0.1400574,0.002600532,0.0003382854,0.0008859296,0.0002886794,0.0004985141,0.01002562,0.1085242,0.7318518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002681875,0.0001882296,0.008070981,0.300348,0.007973327,0.002357933,0.001613457,0.0003697865,0.000935148,0.02418274,0.6534856,0.000206593],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003765275,0.9696741,0.001092479,0.02496339,0.002713724,0.00004640701,0.000351312,0.00002017359,0.0007619413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007710138,0.9612688,0.00316825,0.020023,0.006835062,0.0001644377,0.0004369909,0.00003871281,0.000354576],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8896901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5833814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3611571887827441,"score_gpt":0.5050026682541758,"score_spread":0.1438454794714318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}