{"id":"W2071723414","doi":"10.1139/x01-148","title":"Structure of high-elevation, old-growth stands in west-central British Columbia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Montane ecology; Subalpine forest; Canopy; Elevation (ballistics); Ecological succession; Taiga; Boreal; Physical geography; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119538,0.0001388498,0.0001504268,0.00112097,0.0007797784,0.0007639308,0.0003233363,0.0001396375,0.0009279935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005730971,0.0001362746,0.00006750451,0.001443078,0.0005842296,0.0001656106,0.0003083251,0.0001477339,0.0001118432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004657616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001927778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9053329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998668,0.00000749649,0.00000692694,0.00002727281,0.00003359799,0.000057815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994898,0.00004479527,0.00006605038,0.00002086446,0.0002545089,0.000124045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000804526,0.00002463208,0.9795178,0.00003530001,0.00002909352,0.0003546592,0.001042024,0.001007476,0.004324989,0.000209068,0.0003811722,0.01299347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001354805,0.000004104663,0.9987478,0.000004495241,0.00000459625,0.00004767442,0.000374877,0.0003960111,0.0001065023,0.00001894131,0.0002900774,0.000003439112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990626,0.0001006867,0.00005852748,0.000006843068,5.602346e-7,0.000003179783,0.0001910593,0.000003760715,0.0005726899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993297,0.00004037314,0.00006448914,0.000004012052,2.934377e-7,0.000001650272,0.0001988449,0.000001278248,0.0003594863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09466714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1904492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01240534686791159,"score_gpt":0.2502645696330029,"score_spread":0.2378592227650913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}