{"id":"W2071835348","doi":"10.1139/x99-213","title":"Regional forest resource accounting: a northern Alberta case study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Recreation; Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Forest management; Environmental resource management; Business; Fishing; Geography; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341321,0.0001185152,0.0002683541,0.0005965197,0.0004058094,0.0001602749,0.0003911742,0.00008478828,0.002956608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001559071,0.0001303852,0.0001129739,0.0002569119,0.0001844591,0.0003248392,0.00001943316,0.0004681468,0.001070342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005991423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003177189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1942953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8078448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.00006658775,0.0006839358,0.0002506133,0.0001066679,0.0005232455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987381,0.0001416863,0.0002102466,0.0003027008,0.00006463494,0.0005426799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000163463,0.00006186447,0.9899366,0.000003904498,0.00004408208,0.0009276679,0.001760338,0.001570919,1.286279e-7,0.001414338,0.002784519,0.00147933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009205749,0.0004102954,0.8763636,0.00001964385,0.000006645304,0.001964493,0.003842971,0.0003244327,4.35973e-7,0.004116339,0.1118512,0.000179347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759772,0.0005312205,0.000006156574,0.0009185173,0.00006926512,0.0002304725,0.00001417481,0.000001893896,0.0222511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949127,0.00002638869,0.00003498219,0.00009619007,0.0002645764,0.000009107743,0.000006013642,0.00002860129,0.004621386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6135495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1626950805795046,"score_gpt":0.2781608458597679,"score_spread":0.1154657652802632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}