{"id":"W2071835348","doi":"10.1139/x99-213","title":"Regional forest resource accounting: a northern Alberta case study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Recreation; Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Forest management; Environmental resource management; Business; Fishing; Geography; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001241943,0.0003115922,0.0002511083,0.001590909,0.004769569,0.00245658,0.001917265,0.000843215,0.003181178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001503726,0.0001787489,0.0002584348,0.00505191,0.001292152,0.0006494404,0.0009545484,0.0006981592,0.0002468758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03537253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02347802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9530344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988905,0.0001832407,0.00003132835,0.00007389951,0.0004566929,0.0003644198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988711,0.0002066023,0.0001049563,0.00007297637,0.0005137338,0.0002306781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005318251,0.0008033719,0.2378749,0.0005641463,0.000138684,0.03996069,0.02079809,0.1577667,0.003554581,0.2211716,0.06130658,0.2555289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001670247,0.0004096969,0.3039984,0.0006034399,0.0002959459,0.009765141,0.1048549,0.1347552,0.002894409,0.01557656,0.4263465,0.0003327974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7860795,0.002502422,0.003636741,0.002878782,0.00004385734,0.0003813326,0.001699784,0.0001752209,0.2026024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637988,0.00158221,0.006724589,0.000211128,0.00002105189,0.00007638466,0.0008052927,0.00002107143,0.02675943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0469656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2566469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1626950805795046,"score_gpt":0.2781608458597679,"score_spread":0.1154657652802632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}