{"id":"W2071839582","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2012.719381","title":"Comparison of Two <i>In Vitro</i> Extraction Protocols for Assessing Metals’ Bioaccessibility Using Dust and Soil Reference Materials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Heavy metals in environment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Royal Roads University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Cadmium; Arsenic; NIST; Environmental chemistry; Chromium; Extraction (chemistry); Bioavailability; Environmental science; Chemistry; Certified reference materials; Zinc; Metallurgy; Materials science; Detection limit; Chromatography; Medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00250752,0.0001462652,0.0003038622,0.00006139987,0.0002519332,0.0002256936,0.0002025412,0.00008834629,0.0008717261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007895006,0.0001157872,0.00003902739,0.00003666078,0.0002165412,0.001441604,0.0001831322,0.0002660334,0.000002078342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001312088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009799962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004449227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980788,0.0003653372,0.0006481478,0.0002542911,0.0003836402,0.0002698007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.0001283806,0.0005031523,0.00010115,0.00002084488,0.0001526186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004410463,0.0006950072,0.6376539,0.000005678988,0.00001430627,0.00000120688,0.00007184561,0.0003673059,0.3582349,0.000116984,0.000003839656,0.002790885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000826563,0.0001494122,0.9683419,0.00002148707,0.00002957977,0.00002427939,0.0002290452,0.00398395,0.02461259,0.001435977,0.0002025698,0.0001426401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950293,0.0000117448,0.003303851,0.00002808134,0.0001809058,0.001139199,0.00002097535,0.000007296735,0.0002785932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736649,0.00002317304,0.02589897,0.00002712917,0.0001432396,0.0002110927,0.00001360494,0.000008036738,0.000009811534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3336223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1841434360110454,"score_gpt":0.4990460887597036,"score_spread":0.3149026527486583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}