{"id":"W2071855726","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0695-x","title":"p-Weakly constrained Pareto efficiency and aggregation in incomplete markets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Incomplete markets; Public finance; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Competitive equilibrium; Pareto efficiency; Function (biology); Complete market; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003884257,0.0001038663,0.0002374803,0.00007972593,0.0002019253,0.00004425308,0.0000553559,0.00009395034,0.0001259936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005300584,0.0001239791,0.00003301317,0.00007940584,0.00009994023,0.0002716305,0.0000461092,0.00008992998,0.00001441271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004235227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005786329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003354402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009392751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992207,0.00001477301,0.0002841738,0.0001982017,0.00001447312,0.0002677166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996821,0.00004293488,0.0001256247,0.00007062225,0.000009139064,0.00006954388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009466904,0.00002871905,0.2775506,0.00003008105,0.00001127207,3.90014e-7,0.002049835,0.00000113312,0.000003560907,0.7142032,0.00007337573,0.006038335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009984401,0.00003007137,0.8813033,0.00001405354,0.000006083051,0.000003950566,0.001311583,0.0004035536,0.000005466612,0.03945523,0.07612709,0.0003411844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725286,0.002542747,0.0001110474,0.001799406,0.0001981953,0.0001348516,0.0001057656,0.00001754345,0.02256188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992763,0.0001583331,0.00004290087,0.0001727153,0.0002083042,0.00001233411,0.00001358701,0.00001098781,0.0001045195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.674748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.505572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02365192710172064,"score_gpt":0.2260940331390137,"score_spread":0.202442106037293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}