{"id":"W2071982401","doi":"10.1155/2010/823018","title":"Forest Fire Risk Assessment: An Illustrative Example from Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Probability and Statistics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"Mitacs; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Ignition system; Environmental science; Meteorology; Boreal; Documentation; Taiga; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006838589,0.0001147522,0.0002200206,0.000007694994,0.0001457224,0.0000569559,0.0001604643,0.00005987131,0.001141888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002037069,0.00009234026,0.00002048247,0.00004186841,0.0001514284,0.0002895172,0.00004471209,0.0005755335,0.000002212161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004016147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003660279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987754,0.0001473363,0.0003814971,0.0001728641,0.0003633119,0.0001596313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987643,0.0003996841,0.0003789525,0.0001905035,0.00004699601,0.000219567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004821188,0.0001373014,0.9804094,0.00001357224,0.0000292887,0.00004533261,0.001157188,0.0003042801,0.000438827,0.0009151252,0.003272647,0.01322887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003344938,0.0003858724,0.9566738,0.000008643011,0.00003562959,0.0000216786,0.0001020895,0.01146433,0.00002202802,0.02559443,0.00523594,0.0001210359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886073,0.000004798364,0.01009903,0.00005218691,0.0004180185,0.0001645051,0.0003737405,0.000003271623,0.0002771693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730012,0.000002217635,0.1268425,0.00002649087,0.00005481125,0.000001877131,0.00001324536,0.00000545263,0.00005232424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1167434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009780796151872679,"score_gpt":0.218296077593294,"score_spread":0.2085152814414213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}