{"id":"W2072048902","doi":"10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.049","title":"A rapid solution method to determine the charge capacity of LiFePO4","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Power Sources","topic":"Advancements in Battery Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Electrolysis; Electrolyte; Electrode; Materials science; Carbon fibers; Composite number; Redox; Chemical engineering; Electrochemistry; Nanoparticle; Supporting electrolyte; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Physical chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007338871,0.0001010875,0.000232995,0.00009417227,0.00003124374,0.00001129792,0.000246954,0.00003593081,0.0005760649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006463641,0.00006694829,0.00005989987,0.00007715989,0.00002901796,0.0001549355,0.00003546874,0.0001020327,0.00001454081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000270283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000615501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004774773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.001448e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990869,0.00007330224,0.0004492039,0.00005469624,0.0001829849,0.0001529449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999436,0.00005632016,0.0002252632,0.0001517414,0.00007486789,0.00005579682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652148,0.0001475634,0.001546649,0.0001388562,0.0004082662,0.00002151726,0.02993199,0.001255392,0.9438611,0.0001731121,0.006393734,0.01585664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004430221,0.0004396926,0.006036835,0.000129794,0.00007586685,0.0001430169,0.0003336151,0.0001979476,0.9653413,0.0005014707,0.02614482,0.0002126085],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8981704,0.0002385242,0.09975062,0.00007984118,0.0009004091,0.00008094319,0.000007024574,0.0000171833,0.0007551368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642709,0.00001781415,0.03537442,0.0001195932,0.0001615826,0.000002345824,1.0684e-7,0.00001745745,0.00003571827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06610063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04870527910793204,"score_gpt":0.2623588339357988,"score_spread":0.2136535548278668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}