{"id":"W2072048902","doi":"10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.049","title":"A rapid solution method to determine the charge capacity of LiFePO4","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Power Sources","topic":"Advancements in Battery Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Electrolysis; Electrolyte; Electrode; Materials science; Carbon fibers; Composite number; Redox; Chemical engineering; Electrochemistry; Nanoparticle; Supporting electrolyte; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Physical chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008948151,0.0009471425,0.0004424622,0.001449748,0.0006465726,0.0003539952,0.001333412,0.001004631,0.00349427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001007862,0.0004278357,0.0003294503,0.0005028146,0.0003809789,0.0007590769,0.000619113,0.001504691,0.00151857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004236301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007977646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00105219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999274,0.00008960593,0.00003991269,0.0001477635,0.0003896219,0.00005911654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993808,0.0001815986,0.00005454066,0.00004839136,0.000303288,0.00003126044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007528023,0.00006212204,0.000286186,0.0002982819,0.00002449071,0.00004899115,0.00005732701,0.0001404428,0.9699826,0.000700407,0.001181016,0.02714295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002723929,0.0001531607,0.000536746,0.00001245683,0.00002319606,0.0001587237,0.0000279228,0.002691066,0.9864972,0.0001955974,0.009653327,0.00002337415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2742649,0.01388871,0.6837606,0.001444311,0.001915808,0.001902532,0.003324834,0.003127734,0.01637059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5224114,0.00694509,0.4212758,0.0008543109,0.0002312954,0.00300403,0.00311124,0.0002575834,0.04190922],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00349427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01168948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04870527910793204,"score_gpt":0.2623588339357988,"score_spread":0.2136535548278668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}