{"id":"W2072190206","doi":"10.1007/s11196-011-9250-9","title":"The Languages of the Law: An Integrated View From Vico and Conceptual Metaphor Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Metaphor; Semiotics; Metonymy; Philosophy of law; Conceptual metaphor; Sociology; Applied linguistics; Metaphor and metonymy; Epistemology; Cognitive linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Comparative law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001874962,0.0002256342,0.0002961927,0.00007269449,0.0002561724,0.00009698114,0.001665401,0.0001667209,0.0003389837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006333888,0.0001257049,0.0003430936,0.00007739973,0.0007957992,0.0002207721,0.0001451458,0.0005504981,0.000004846358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000941366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001374248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002089171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002111178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976265,0.0006955659,0.0007973147,0.0002454317,0.0003985542,0.0002366481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950467,0.002516923,0.0008269548,0.0004263041,0.001096186,0.00008696366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005250382,0.0002023288,0.0005289095,0.00001145632,0.001433816,0.00001679776,0.01035518,0.0000241452,0.00185814,0.9785271,0.0002531707,0.006263917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003409003,0.0006379398,0.01867756,0.001089661,0.001053582,0.001455669,0.02572559,0.0006353583,0.1119952,0.7401435,0.09446436,0.0007125632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083008,0.0113132,0.03090893,0.005760121,0.008522076,0.001329634,0.001608946,0.00006734586,0.03218902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938914,0.0007595625,0.001457981,0.001355892,0.0006861294,0.00004086081,0.00004292845,0.00004101622,0.001724287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2383836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03449548553404921,"score_gpt":0.3222080869670633,"score_spread":0.2877126014330141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}