{"id":"W2072311069","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2014.985515","title":"Water and the future of humanity: revisiting water security","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Water security; Environmental ethics; Purchasing; Water sector; Environmental science; Water resource management; Business; Political science; Water resources; Water supply; Ecology; Philosophy; Environmental engineering; Law; Biology; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00615619,0.0004757294,0.0007754709,0.0006769204,0.004241177,0.001198755,0.001326655,0.0002545218,0.0003256224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001128041,0.0002527639,0.0003097873,0.0001837061,0.00297356,0.0004486145,0.0001586523,0.0008559689,0.00002225777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005809159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001134723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2895036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8173425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939126,0.001959414,0.0009028388,0.0005570284,0.00041744,0.002250622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971968,0.0001311687,0.0001950681,0.0005912032,0.0003636927,0.001522046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008641332,0.000009408553,0.001834747,0.0002344148,0.0001583553,0.0001228654,0.9883417,0.0000887591,0.0003086755,0.0005538609,0.00003162018,0.008229195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000827137,0.00008908612,0.0002072407,0.0002402207,0.0001252414,0.000202618,0.01075964,0.00008746431,0.002128863,0.01163359,0.9732513,0.0004475642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700072,0.001368052,0.00002274417,0.01555372,0.0003445491,0.0005150769,0.00001785114,0.00006573883,0.01210502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942194,0.0006835773,0.00005796503,0.0009361256,0.002714601,0.00002239119,0.00002617391,0.00007978709,0.001259956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.977582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00897500510551078,"score_gpt":0.2076383526803591,"score_spread":0.1986633475748483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}