{"id":"W2072311069","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2014.985515","title":"Water and the future of humanity: revisiting water security","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Water security; Environmental ethics; Purchasing; Water sector; Environmental science; Water resource management; Business; Political science; Water resources; Water supply; Ecology; Philosophy; Environmental engineering; Law; Biology; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021837,0.001135505,0.001832804,0.003693028,0.002955139,0.007306983,0.002331759,0.008681295,0.004996341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01127424,0.0003836495,0.0008986498,0.004077987,0.03412012,0.02215935,0.005387674,0.009689075,0.0008659468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01475329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02498455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07184465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09736402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958669,0.001824398,0.0002451006,0.0003145903,0.00125949,0.0004894909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876798,0.007417541,0.0006848732,0.0004802834,0.00290836,0.0008291347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000594568,0.00004327534,0.0006710436,0.00445473,0.00009193782,0.0001791589,0.004218719,0.0009773772,0.0005843598,0.4840974,0.28694,0.2176826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001156505,0.00004391533,0.001047788,0.005040894,0.00002332824,0.0001195798,0.005035409,0.0003378957,0.0002283179,0.2924913,0.695546,0.00007401026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005594533,0.6623299,0.00100285,0.3191035,0.01027563,0.00001046108,0.00004993886,0.00002440031,0.00664396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03761877,0.8630027,0.002174617,0.07617668,0.01630212,0.00004569432,0.00006831601,0.00004016807,0.004571006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07184465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1428529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00897500510551078,"score_gpt":0.2076383526803591,"score_spread":0.1986633475748483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}