{"id":"W2072337808","doi":"10.1007/s10957-010-9758-2","title":"Equivalent Conditions for Jacobian Nonsingularity in Linear Symmetric Cone Programming","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications","topic":"Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions; Jacobian matrix and determinant; Mathematics; Theory of computation; Cone (formal languages); Interior point method; Constraint (computer-aided design); Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586535,0.0001064063,0.0002171176,0.0004414474,0.0002192062,0.00005238265,0.0001508443,0.00009864105,0.00008343015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001713099,0.0001008819,0.00006693976,0.000655941,0.0001441405,0.0001999774,0.00003218465,0.0003475862,0.000001086522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003391847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009320689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.140783e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003280547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988444,0.00009524309,0.0005569943,0.0001451548,0.0001816556,0.0001765238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973401,0.001287601,0.0004015821,0.0001801654,0.0006643106,0.0001262626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009613747,0.0006382718,0.0001440281,0.00009383792,0.00004406905,0.000002142835,0.0002476283,0.08604321,0.001003919,0.8969333,0.00006667784,0.0146868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004005922,0.0002693926,0.0001837486,0.0001077237,0.0001661593,0.0002182403,0.0009736481,0.2923099,0.001406331,0.6885334,0.01136308,0.0004624132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003501994,0.0000525782,0.9948815,0.0003473706,0.00007674185,0.0008894611,0.00002319942,0.00001858761,0.0002085922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09343231,0.00009779831,0.9057547,0.00005271456,0.0001962618,0.0001924916,0.00002429175,0.00002978648,0.000219567],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2083998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4113843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03391072149333239,"score_gpt":0.3880796826192206,"score_spread":0.3541689611258882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}