{"id":"W2072348339","doi":"10.7577/formakademisk.794","title":"Systemic Design: Two Canadian Case Studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Systems thinking; Procurement; Knowledge management; Purchasing; Natural resource; Business; Computer science; Operations management; Engineering; Marketing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03096316,0.0012788,0.002317518,0.002516402,0.002983773,0.001353442,0.002737296,0.0005861473,0.0002450316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02138501,0.001011776,0.0009163897,0.002420921,0.0006459816,0.001581202,0.0003523535,0.0007319184,0.001136475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007223517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002971476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001881621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864781,0.001869719,0.003929705,0.002282822,0.002720159,0.002719469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697717,0.02200295,0.00175651,0.002482141,0.002252221,0.001734432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00181511,0.0001703401,0.002166845,0.0003609825,0.0009685891,0.002277716,0.009879637,0.09680882,0.002572727,0.1824966,0.590284,0.1101986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005831924,0.001957594,0.00003552577,0.0007357625,0.0004069943,0.02448951,0.005136534,0.5112206,0.001938208,0.3140183,0.1312067,0.003022435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007374601,0.003043023,0.9809862,0.0002288238,0.002328144,0.003948719,0.00009815314,0.0004485017,0.001543861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8517731,0.00001876387,0.1408243,0.000782692,0.0009380744,0.0008376118,0.00001022596,0.0001947581,0.004620492],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8443985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2769062890008399,"score_gpt":0.4263624813592571,"score_spread":0.1494561923584172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}