{"id":"W2072606883","doi":"10.1142/s021962200600209x","title":"MODEL RISK IN VaR ESTIMATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Value at risk; EWMA chart; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Heteroscedasticity; Stock exchange; Autoregressive model; Stock market index; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Stock market; Risk management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00137628,0.0001127989,0.0002860348,0.002247627,0.00007404428,0.0001216943,0.0005833614,0.0001645978,0.00003541171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007889024,0.0001190546,0.00008193424,0.0004101112,0.00003229883,0.002137204,0.00008905094,0.0003992868,0.00006034334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002238513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004892586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004357878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005402505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976295,0.000014623,0.001891477,0.0001295819,0.0001923584,0.000142452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980044,0.00007605579,0.001342825,0.0001870734,0.0003660421,0.00002361041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001317572,0.0002744859,0.4393999,0.000001593166,0.00002035359,0.00001128981,0.000697345,0.4316466,0.00000177739,0.0315273,0.0001504144,0.0961372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000672647,0.00008225973,0.055232,0.00002992835,0.000002687622,0.00002084508,0.0002039814,0.5901669,0.000005964122,0.3531719,0.000332873,0.00007797057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5204427,0.00006628641,0.4785894,0.0001723191,0.0002391175,0.0000654207,0.00001275575,0.00001737091,0.0003946756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911376,0.00002473696,0.08843521,0.00008476216,0.00005998417,0.000004244473,0.000004356171,0.000006282926,0.000004440101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3909333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4854908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02819777697012986,"score_gpt":0.3192634793017492,"score_spread":0.2910657023316193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}