{"id":"W2072619795","doi":"10.1002/cjs.10027","title":"Some notes on poisson limits for empirical point processes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Point process; Mathematics; Poisson distribution; Bivariate analysis; Limit (mathematics); Dimension (graph theory); Poisson point process; Applied mathematics; Central limit theorem; Statistics; Statistical physics; Point (geometry); Multivariate statistics; Econometrics; Mathematical analysis; Pure mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01161942,0.0007666792,0.001389574,0.004302026,0.001447376,0.002945796,0.002166988,0.002388253,0.008449365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05022998,0.0006202733,0.002370892,0.002411995,0.005166888,0.00497497,0.003488374,0.005613679,0.0007550213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002290562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000934971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003277675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001515267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957054,0.001736217,0.0003259323,0.0005077784,0.001477436,0.0002472525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783649,0.0148743,0.001634859,0.001154069,0.002886293,0.00108574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001330999,0.00001113709,0.0004986578,0.00004686337,0.00001692251,0.0001962666,0.0001767853,0.00483018,0.0002801812,0.9886136,0.001360659,0.003955313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001299583,0.00001990989,0.0006468972,0.00007646972,0.00001374673,0.0002168295,0.00006952575,0.0558801,0.0002721796,0.936164,0.006590405,0.0000370282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07590513,0.008430885,0.8393954,0.007994821,0.001971114,0.00009634348,0.0003031682,0.000307508,0.06559562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8404314,0.007870771,0.1048149,0.003956421,0.006122521,0.0004257102,0.00039677,0.0005201689,0.03546128],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01161942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06145012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0906567962478868,"score_gpt":0.2751439658765865,"score_spread":0.1844871696286997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}