{"id":"W2072706969","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.109","title":"DEMOCRATIC OBJECTIONS TO STRUCTURAL JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Federalism; Law; Judicial activism; Political science; Constitution; Judicial independence; Separation of powers; Democracy; Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05806635,0.0005319615,0.001098049,0.002127882,0.008672517,0.01361309,0.003136344,0.01455284,0.003413616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09916698,0.0007032881,0.001435861,0.001544661,0.05001447,0.01082234,0.007066478,0.01722342,0.0008498208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007907235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01033515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003121394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00357284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.929729,0.03565144,0.002941304,0.007956078,0.01923354,0.004488716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8834133,0.09119885,0.007540619,0.009659916,0.006950195,0.001237147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004272538,0.000005629702,0.00006391848,0.00001327023,0.000003735124,0.00001596147,0.0004035985,0.0001692684,0.0000438311,0.9961183,0.001140049,0.002018255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003671016,0.00002450662,0.0001875367,0.00008970573,0.00001585003,0.00005284674,0.0001392245,0.0007449803,0.0003142683,0.9694335,0.02893994,0.00002092735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03949143,0.01480052,0.1320545,0.3912188,0.003860845,0.0002121236,0.00007126854,0.0002682294,0.4180223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889972,0.004603483,0.02055399,0.05586814,0.00716475,0.0004789113,0.00004302272,0.000136926,0.02117882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05806635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3070879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007300103575219185,"score_gpt":0.2430501129456353,"score_spread":0.2357500093704161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}