{"id":"W2072898412","doi":"10.1155/s0161171204301183","title":"On mixed‐type reverse‐order laws for the Moore‐Penrose inverse of a matrix product","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences","topic":"Matrix Theory and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Mathematics; Type (biology); Order (exchange); Inverse; Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse; Matrix (chemical analysis); Product (mathematics); Generalized inverse; Law; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002111366,0.0001188436,0.0002394484,0.000125703,0.000125688,0.0001650105,0.00130906,0.00003055555,0.00002791682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001427518,0.00006420913,0.0001062245,0.0002578329,0.0003367694,0.000325805,0.0001521154,0.0001101537,0.000008241223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002385768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003551246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001808988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998392,0.00002379847,0.0005432409,0.0001528144,0.0007344999,0.0001536404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976349,0.001149256,0.000486773,0.0001858922,0.0004705795,0.00007262814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001390655,0.0002658294,0.000003330998,0.00006299427,0.0000512324,0.000005822273,0.0007470621,0.0006178005,0.0005383171,0.995472,0.0002365749,0.001985144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005453556,0.0003662568,0.00001434538,0.0002511017,0.00002456781,0.000228333,0.0003500415,0.02156094,0.003051242,0.9731557,0.0003576007,0.00009452516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047609,0.0002027184,0.8841459,0.008303449,0.001088285,0.0003676656,0.000007588688,0.00001708811,0.001106455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3061127,0.00009952184,0.6931673,0.0002323482,0.0001860932,0.000006880012,2.575433e-7,0.000008313673,0.0001865985],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2013518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02793857215225576,"score_gpt":0.3157157711540006,"score_spread":0.2877771990017448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}