{"id":"W2073022320","doi":"10.1142/s1464333213500154","title":"KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AGENCIES: A STUDY IN QUÉBEC, CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Government (linguistics); Business; Incentive; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Public relations; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Computer science; Environmental science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007812827,0.0006406002,0.0007194183,0.0004690573,0.0001984236,0.0001196031,0.0006346195,0.00009642838,0.002477924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004768404,0.0005626026,0.0001844792,0.0004159889,0.0002591597,0.001001175,0.001218318,0.0005548859,0.00006748971],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01537064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001792216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2279237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1797845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953827,0.0003562316,0.001387418,0.0006325914,0.001293227,0.0009478519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984559,0.00009168441,0.0005374573,0.0004325022,0.000002223343,0.0004802106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004393333,0.004871221,0.9600722,0.00004409866,0.0003924149,0.0005864071,0.001614415,0.001180948,0.0009669645,0.0001128406,0.001808669,0.02830587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003383524,0.0006542194,0.9738315,0.00005249145,0.00009160419,0.000031267,0.01668218,0.0003143569,0.00001326688,0.0002092768,0.004216064,0.0005203066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696897,0.0001661043,0.0000311811,0.000474358,0.0001624079,0.002030506,0.00002296327,0.000009393499,0.02741334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944862,0.001723438,0.001296862,0.000479737,0.00007567894,0.0002003433,0.00001070879,0.00005151605,0.001675591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04813919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01017456026093337,"score_gpt":0.30258325128451,"score_spread":0.2924086910235766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}