{"id":"W2073056252","doi":"10.1067/mcp.2001.116892","title":"Red wine–cisapride interaction: Comparison with grapefruit juice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","topic":"Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Cisapride; Grapefruit juice; Pharmacokinetics; Crossover study; Citrus paradisi; Pharmacology; Area under the curve; Chemistry; Wine; Drug interaction; Oral administration; Medicine; Food science; Placebo; Rutaceae; Botany; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001819102,0.0007587583,0.001233753,0.000253418,0.0005841295,0.00006024278,0.001082258,0.0008910422,0.004705961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003217694,0.0006618882,0.0004376428,0.0007902883,0.001192715,0.0002525403,0.0002626321,0.003552481,0.0008484696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001034676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002529417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008104425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001282965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933886,0.002066684,0.001736382,0.001091279,0.000421017,0.001296056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953461,0.002041481,0.0007184385,0.0005707203,0.0004386155,0.0008846109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02515342,0.01251498,0.2492706,0.000110415,0.01184658,0.001821096,0.001673576,0.007520967,0.1240014,0.0002764575,0.3362661,0.2295444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008901616,0.0007493205,0.01186836,0.000014891,0.003238497,0.0003003914,0.0001736054,0.008265743,0.01613916,0.0002525002,0.9492958,0.0008001488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358424,0.003249936,0.001199351,0.02820753,0.01465884,0.001236977,0.00005216936,0.0005353226,0.01501749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530948,0.005915531,0.0008785034,0.1335603,0.004420291,0.0001411415,0.00005583332,0.0001322883,0.001801323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6130297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3643346742385714,"score_gpt":0.5632199207657329,"score_spread":0.1988852465271616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}