{"id":"W2073183445","doi":"10.2316/journal.208.2006.1.208-1026","title":"COLLABORATIVE WRITING IN A SOFTWARE GAME: RE-ENACTING A VYGOTSKIAN DESIGN","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced Technology for Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Danish; Focus (optics); Software; Mathematics education; Multimedia; Zone of proximal development; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002575606,0.0003123075,0.0004827951,0.0009835279,0.0004676589,0.0000329112,0.0002866713,0.0004763625,0.00006471948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004302097,0.000346049,0.0000715471,0.002207448,0.0002102273,0.000161079,0.00006620521,0.001997323,0.00003391989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001841296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006151998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004968755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002479062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968016,0.0008388447,0.000613581,0.0007350535,0.0001238076,0.0008871013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709,0.001837291,0.0004808445,0.0003291783,0.0002333693,0.00002927026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005791879,0.0002485142,0.1372192,0.00005946291,0.0001053236,0.0001430016,0.006293154,0.04241802,0.0205809,0.05169702,0.0003325173,0.7403237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02984095,0.007197456,0.107535,0.002454882,0.0002237035,0.0004217968,0.1832089,0.008757568,0.03889182,0.2008176,0.4143958,0.00625459],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3103195,0.0007459391,0.6825194,0.0005706536,0.0002525419,0.0006612526,0.000003042892,0.001288774,0.003638912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6505094,0.000002226227,0.347412,0.00005417758,0.00007337647,0.0003765618,0.00001519773,0.0000687958,0.001488263],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0197813888720864,"score_gpt":0.3662682688115041,"score_spread":0.3464868799394177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}