{"id":"W2073185138","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.12.002","title":"No change is a good change? Restrictive deterrence in illegal drug markets","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Cannabis; Deterrence (psychology); Recidivism; Hazard; Sample (material); Drug; Psychology; Psychiatry; Criminology; Political science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003723894,0.0001581612,0.0005014132,0.0006165069,0.002317588,0.001607968,0.0009957365,0.001982211,0.003099794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01786974,0.0002398926,0.0003167215,0.0005724514,0.003715444,0.002748576,0.002053035,0.0032167,0.0001253853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002037116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003837663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02193613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06848815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952204,0.002592661,0.0001856293,0.0002230349,0.0005007735,0.001277544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894386,0.004428743,0.002232355,0.0005148202,0.0007668769,0.002618594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002445218,0.01206237,0.4189697,0.0004672908,0.0003473541,0.001472441,0.01537749,0.003025281,0.001625082,0.09923,0.02305093,0.4219269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006752444,0.002630915,0.8690075,0.0007263914,0.0002292879,0.0008493525,0.0515225,0.00415269,0.001320807,0.05305425,0.01571973,0.0001114188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957719,0.0009660494,0.00020121,0.03162965,0.0001132805,0.00003321772,0.00003385389,0.000005992048,0.009297812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980203,0.0002201067,0.00006333489,0.001280248,0.00003047728,0.00001065726,0.000008755919,0.000001150653,0.0003650073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02193613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04361689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2021121321615357,"score_gpt":0.3820513498787576,"score_spread":0.1799392177172219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}