{"id":"W2073348175","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2003.tb00176.x","title":"Social Welfare and the Selection of the Optimum Hog Slaughter Weight in Quebec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Harm; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Animal welfare; Selection (genetic algorithm); Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Production (economics); Interpretation (philosophy); Welfare; Public economics; Function (biology); Social Welfare; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Law; Epistemology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00128261,0.0002385667,0.0002817089,0.0009000173,0.00225991,0.001860903,0.0008427756,0.0005636461,0.003913723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002572528,0.0001417852,0.0002970157,0.001365424,0.001492528,0.0005683632,0.0007182251,0.0004603465,0.0001418417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07281762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02568604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991929,0.0002075484,0.00001742571,0.00007034021,0.0001200163,0.0003917445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985734,0.0003167309,0.0001859573,0.0000409927,0.0006324049,0.0002504822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001068783,0.0004115314,0.4993425,0.0002304734,0.0004358718,0.001726188,0.004342215,0.1768239,0.005765861,0.1765677,0.02251028,0.1107747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001152054,0.00020598,0.7523052,0.0001866628,0.0001308743,0.0001312752,0.007420802,0.1869092,0.000925524,0.02268015,0.02885819,0.0001309513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572221,0.0008544596,0.003149568,0.003291274,0.00002419364,0.0000491356,0.0008975359,0.00003216613,0.03447948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951102,0.000142403,0.0004197538,0.00006876315,0.000002895652,0.000007649017,0.0001356425,0.00000524707,0.004107461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07281762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5283313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01087067871914784,"score_gpt":0.1494515855302111,"score_spread":0.1385809068110632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}