{"id":"W2073381933","doi":"10.1080/14742837.2011.614108","title":"Framed Encounters with Conservation and Mining Development: Indigenous Peoples' use of Strategic Framing in Suriname","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social movement studies","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Framing (construction); Social movement; Negotiation; Human rights; Indigenous rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Traditional knowledge; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Geography; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001483399,0.000115967,0.0001902076,0.00009697863,0.0001027022,0.00001233394,0.00003849302,0.00003403364,0.000003534043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001232615,0.0001035962,0.00001140107,0.0001134288,0.00006740449,0.00005264986,0.00004114425,0.00005883007,3.700605e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006270721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001583169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001830325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008175137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993677,0.00001840878,0.0002050911,0.0001076877,0.0001258736,0.0001752037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997983,0.00005769477,0.00005589805,0.00004456447,0.00002862732,0.00001489598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003924915,0.00006009122,0.3148941,0.0005681495,0.0005250131,0.00001398494,0.6810099,0.0004849653,0.00009597149,0.0004441301,0.00003913956,0.001825278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007759898,0.0001339238,0.6771177,0.0003747517,0.00004666543,2.981789e-7,0.3199764,0.0003537465,0.0005850397,0.0001086406,0.000187639,0.0003391567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985866,0.0003170865,0.00009216209,0.00001213265,0.0000471703,0.0001549831,0.000001317299,0.0000415124,0.0007470654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981076,0.0001441077,0.001587498,0.00005449747,0.00001138431,0.00003250283,0.000001984583,0.00001282931,0.00004766829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3622236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.422453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07871449870249939,"score_gpt":0.2328497465866973,"score_spread":0.1541352478841979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}