{"id":"W2073409877","doi":"10.1007/s10853-005-0587-x","title":"Comparison of testing methods for fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in resistance to in-plane sliding mode of delamination (Mode II)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Delamination (geology); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Composite material; Solid mechanics; Mode (computer interface); Polymer; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00183535,0.00009167888,0.0004116686,0.0004021902,0.0000332087,0.00002444658,0.0003661726,0.00004042595,0.00001090168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006820085,0.00008802308,0.00002787077,0.0004541144,0.00003190964,0.0003750123,0.00004138183,0.0000684495,2.808759e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001389912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004658669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001654698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001455272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983566,0.00004380183,0.001000184,0.00009708888,0.0002877798,0.0002145928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989933,0.0003159929,0.0003572295,0.0001103199,0.0001556802,0.00006749054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005564623,0.00001245494,0.00008911896,0.00005544522,0.00000128616,4.498278e-7,0.0003799554,0.1331995,0.8638052,0.000313012,0.000004890454,0.00208311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000249546,0.000143612,0.0008675497,0.0003431746,0.000007084665,0.000004814593,0.00005292038,0.04830202,0.9498641,0.00007595,0.00001012342,0.000079083],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303821,0.00006374384,0.06912109,0.00004265428,0.0001850018,0.0001319835,0.000006042391,0.000007289853,0.0000601032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.688724,0.000001626138,0.3112346,0.000004095231,0.00002010279,0.000002431156,3.003742e-7,0.000006015891,0.00000683607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2421135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3589477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04196321944220565,"score_gpt":0.3782778732601562,"score_spread":0.3363146538179506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}