{"id":"W2073409877","doi":"10.1007/s10853-005-0587-x","title":"Comparison of testing methods for fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in resistance to in-plane sliding mode of delamination (Mode II)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Delamination (geology); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Composite material; Solid mechanics; Mode (computer interface); Polymer; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002109786,0.001002025,0.0005311597,0.00128712,0.0004051321,0.0003658464,0.001017272,0.0008303639,0.001528397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298021,0.0005724333,0.0004992378,0.0005618171,0.0004264602,0.0009342559,0.000534007,0.0005099541,0.0004379544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002357246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002547996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006206201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002307689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977417,0.0003923415,0.000200019,0.0003854164,0.001127599,0.0001529169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915116,0.004135547,0.000809595,0.0005877181,0.002755561,0.0001998489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008609015,0.0001669166,0.004425481,0.0003846039,0.00003374454,0.00006947948,0.000346398,0.000432184,0.9567555,0.0001035601,0.00008248942,0.03633884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003425135,0.003927688,0.01750747,0.00003574954,0.00009277218,0.0005971973,0.0002847828,0.006165493,0.9699717,0.0001325996,0.001200516,0.00004984593],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221715,0.002586445,0.07210188,0.00008237637,0.0001143893,0.0002794778,0.000336544,0.0003210063,0.002006298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262783,0.001314784,0.06905985,0.00005725517,0.00002911346,0.0001973132,0.0002954652,0.000101451,0.002666474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002109786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01115769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04196321944220565,"score_gpt":0.3782778732601562,"score_spread":0.3363146538179506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}