{"id":"W2073454474","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.011","title":"The evaluation of the PACA regional public health plan: Reconciling the managerial, scientific and democratic finalities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Democracy; Charter; Legitimacy; Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Valuation (finance); Normative; Plan (archaeology); Public health; Public relations; Process (computing); Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Engineering; Accounting; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2450175,0.0008741036,0.001386921,0.00307625,0.01809085,0.03293236,0.007192136,0.01289409,0.004612258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2791027,0.001329328,0.0009499142,0.00278731,0.02880319,0.01124602,0.01573716,0.01999608,0.0004314377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04433972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2861924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1312045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1567104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7404159,0.176786,0.004019997,0.005137757,0.05366101,0.01997931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7830029,0.1449926,0.006890454,0.01036714,0.04104643,0.01370037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000180424,0.0003716958,0.004483249,0.0005156075,0.0001526083,0.0002050982,0.009039589,0.007499126,0.00027293,0.8114544,0.09905598,0.06676941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007011959,0.0008087103,0.02182391,0.002391486,0.0003299813,0.0002140104,0.0334472,0.01253148,0.00295201,0.4818641,0.4424514,0.0004845245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03142307,0.003035113,0.01089234,0.7688504,0.001536209,0.0008885306,0.0001837673,0.000158381,0.1830322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652207,0.002255859,0.02151882,0.08014688,0.001831244,0.001897627,0.0001986319,0.0002622958,0.02666789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2450175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7150776386698127,"score_gpt":0.5741322276462048,"score_spread":0.1409454110236079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}