{"id":"W2073488963","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.020","title":"An integrated assessment model of carbon sequestration benefits: A case study of Liping county, China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Afforestation; Reforestation; Subsidy; China; Carbon credit; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental science; Geography; Climate change; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005148546,0.0002122218,0.0002974565,0.0001839285,0.00006700064,0.00002609566,0.0003038285,0.00004318193,0.0002652979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001403343,0.0001884584,0.00008650262,0.0001793882,0.0001130435,0.0004181472,0.0001907124,0.0001476218,0.000003368961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004066089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007242761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002618207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002627496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997878,0.00009036544,0.0008611235,0.0002170101,0.0007459167,0.0002075529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988205,0.00001048779,0.0007758228,0.0003142155,0.000005678865,0.00007330943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008327997,0.004908595,0.1230308,0.0000536705,0.0001557806,0.0004104846,0.0008838545,0.855406,0.007008266,0.0004929143,0.0002683273,0.007297971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005814509,0.006272369,0.6313755,0.0001887433,0.00102683,0.0002845666,0.01048079,0.34122,0.001131362,0.0009446535,0.0004241677,0.000836546],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992025,0.00002494654,0.0003943068,0.00002523963,0.00007250054,0.0004901529,0.00001581643,0.000007787941,0.006944217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966827,0.00005605487,0.002855415,0.00001908197,0.00004144057,0.000008126095,0.000008723141,0.00002011804,0.0003083312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.514186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.768511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01068573652949593,"score_gpt":0.2465991108219403,"score_spread":0.2359133742924444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}