{"id":"W2073511668","doi":"10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00040.x","title":"On Why Joint Attention Might Look Atypical in Autism: A Case for a Strong Policy Statement but More Nuanced Empirical Story","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development Perspectives","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Joint attention; Positivism; Statement (logic); Empirical evidence; Cognitive psychology; Empirical research; Theory of mind; Joint (building); Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06192311,0.0004642571,0.00156144,0.002083984,0.004966857,0.007550928,0.006363091,0.03982034,0.01356529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2407341,0.0004973147,0.00105359,0.00246694,0.04599491,0.01914041,0.005627332,0.03950023,0.001540717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005972251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01210777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01314359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01250319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9687818,0.0166231,0.002468536,0.005454103,0.004401401,0.002271067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5971411,0.3551582,0.01254193,0.009578354,0.01728482,0.00829563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005964955,0.0002310921,0.0158454,0.0008806028,0.0001545524,0.003257314,0.008496929,0.0008576902,0.000706238,0.7303634,0.1901579,0.04845249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001949986,0.0001153085,0.009057799,0.00335032,0.000149457,0.001892234,0.01817478,0.00144974,0.0007973577,0.8472614,0.1173009,0.000255573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002776893,0.001318299,0.0007340843,0.9925217,0.0006303633,0.000006523902,0.00005372809,0.000009837346,0.001948561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3118292,0.004913812,0.003630064,0.6720541,0.005222337,0.0002014898,0.000133967,0.00008258084,0.001932498],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06192311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3274847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06942286044161006,"score_gpt":0.3531674108947018,"score_spread":0.2837445504530917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}