{"id":"W2073511668","doi":"10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00040.x","title":"On Why Joint Attention Might Look Atypical in Autism: A Case for a Strong Policy Statement but More Nuanced Empirical Story","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development Perspectives","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Joint attention; Positivism; Statement (logic); Empirical evidence; Cognitive psychology; Empirical research; Theory of mind; Joint (building); Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003316531,0.0003758399,0.0003876745,0.0007850456,0.0008814184,0.00005847275,0.0002974651,0.0001158736,0.0001133238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006557333,0.0003548545,0.0001390539,0.0006316103,0.0004249071,0.000284162,0.0002024158,0.0006135433,0.00007940627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002018853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007772782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005542248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001351356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963356,0.0002670358,0.0005219054,0.001195828,0.0007547475,0.0009249247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989883,0.000224688,0.0001403592,0.0003752823,0.00003186461,0.0002395285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006892927,0.01663994,0.02601412,0.0005783956,0.0003728117,0.01603571,0.3766602,0.001122996,0.02597083,0.5066801,0.01705369,0.005978193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01143165,0.001270484,0.9006445,0.0004377452,0.00001983195,0.002838185,0.01796032,0.001949695,0.04664176,0.008092356,0.006683263,0.002030182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585311,0.0001655994,0.003261862,0.03506948,0.00009212773,0.001615945,0.00003103135,0.0001324426,0.001100347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964386,0.00008342483,0.001226394,0.0007784959,0.00006348648,0.0004040439,0.000009909902,0.00005374642,0.0009418558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8746304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06942286044161006,"score_gpt":0.3531674108947018,"score_spread":0.2837445504530917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}