{"id":"W2073571283","doi":"10.1080/00039890409602948","title":"Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon–DNA Adducts and Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Environmental Health An International Journal","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Gillings School of Public Health; Breast Cancer Research Foundation","keywords":"Breast cancer; Odds ratio; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Population; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Cancer; Carcinogen; Chemistry; DNA adduct; Medicine; Oncology; Endocrinology; Biochemistry; Environmental chemistry; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007824526,0.0001102798,0.0001611906,0.0001463524,0.00009552063,0.00002246295,0.0001907164,0.00002849331,0.00002166557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002752616,0.0001057737,0.0001204375,0.00003346666,0.0001154789,0.00001181069,0.00007709083,0.0000912275,8.263836e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005775594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009584868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001470466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990501,0.00004962449,0.0002890537,0.0001994569,0.0002331124,0.0001785975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.000006984163,0.0002107755,0.0001266275,0.000001917726,0.0002308246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004401959,0.0008539813,0.1108364,0.0000133688,0.002098608,0.00001668958,0.00108165,0.001009838,0.7458841,0.00007744887,0.00001122513,0.1376765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001447004,0.0005971575,0.9798141,0.00003803454,0.0001419985,0.000423918,0.0003647831,0.0003829255,0.01552908,0.0008992432,0.0001859964,0.0001758106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971155,0.0008261718,0.0005495707,0.001092987,0.000087054,0.00007584465,0.0001635401,0.000002157612,0.00008716683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953967,0.002542714,0.0012032,0.0005128378,0.0001931939,0.000004614821,0.0001048297,0.000009847182,0.00003204634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4313328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005284686431049162,"score_gpt":0.2694093920033541,"score_spread":0.2641247055723049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}