{"id":"W2073612087","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.025","title":"On-farm welfare assessment for regulatory purposes: Issues and possible solutions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Livestock Science","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Biochemical engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Natural resource economics; Biotechnology; Economics; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003750398,0.0001542516,0.0001529875,0.0001132023,0.001840526,0.0001205704,0.0003165276,0.00005440817,0.00005955985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001072251,0.0001306843,0.00005045826,0.0002141049,0.000930036,0.0002149999,0.0002470071,0.0001829009,0.00001337248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004093457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009097462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008439665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004046134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986233,0.00001450495,0.0001540934,0.0004766354,0.0003102444,0.0004212884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992584,0.00006101069,0.00005888969,0.0003399882,0.0001430963,0.0001386238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008179982,0.0002215419,0.01879606,0.00003578782,0.00001227802,0.0000120473,0.0008339384,0.000002463822,0.2998356,0.6703019,0.0006397976,0.009226785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002266456,0.001337136,0.9907568,0.00001737155,0.00001863395,0.00003729275,0.0005537721,0.0001043877,0.0003348904,0.002775849,0.003626755,0.0002104307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906838,0.0001090893,0.0001851016,0.001623071,0.0004776755,0.0004861596,0.00004370997,0.000103668,0.006287733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921158,0.000007353751,0.006979692,0.00008059832,0.00008104043,0.0001415737,0.000002237576,0.00001261007,0.0005791154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04979416857974766,"score_gpt":0.3738556683835135,"score_spread":0.3240614998037658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}