{"id":"W2073633025","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.029","title":"Multi-stage sampling for large scale natural resources surveys: A case study of rice and waterfowl","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Waterfowl; Sampling design; Stratified sampling; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Scale (ratio); Habitat; Sample (material); Statistics; Paddy field; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Cartography; Population; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281891,0.0001866347,0.0002651787,0.00009893043,0.0001717523,0.00003639752,0.0002186465,0.00002867391,0.0001573611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004473402,0.0001465417,0.00009484236,0.00007319984,0.00006469534,0.0002745012,0.0004341671,0.000117499,0.0000108483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001363989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.011072e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007908738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001947655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983929,0.0001174068,0.0005437809,0.0002642651,0.000401703,0.0002799711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999306,0.00004652874,0.0003431689,0.0001978319,0.000002920249,0.0001036152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006138152,0.01737041,0.7745426,0.0005553746,0.001330718,0.00248657,0.03199251,0.01703202,0.01516446,0.00001072212,0.001953408,0.1369474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009905746,0.001361628,0.8791704,0.00005954058,0.0003826457,0.0003662142,0.05536361,0.004799174,0.0002698413,0.00001166119,0.04783022,0.0004793692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966511,0.0002127944,0.002103205,0.00008516845,0.00009940533,0.0006432675,0.00002096425,0.000006195101,0.0001779249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880344,0.00009076385,0.009945801,0.0001008273,0.00006618469,0.00001326413,0.00000186818,0.00001845034,0.001728426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.136468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5975797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02297546093581547,"score_gpt":0.2646764320697934,"score_spread":0.241700971133978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}