{"id":"W2073701698","doi":"10.1139/f02-121","title":"Algal production and trihalomethane formation potential: an experimental assessment and inter-river comparison","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Water Treatment and Disinfection","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trihalomethane; Environmental science; Tributary; Algal bloom; Water quality; Water pollution; Hydrology (agriculture); Eutrophication; Chlorophyll a; Environmental chemistry; Environmental engineering; Water treatment; Ecology; Chemistry; Phytoplankton; Nutrient; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006409111,0.0003987867,0.0002890581,0.0002992626,0.0005031236,0.0004086889,0.0003054273,0.0004093399,0.0006705499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007043543,0.0002507673,0.0004398432,0.0004383547,0.0004762164,0.000589281,0.0003458519,0.0005538297,0.0001099687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00102892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004449178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009009328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01142958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993624,0.000182691,0.00004642088,0.0001906253,0.0001464363,0.00007143584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.0001453456,0.000169425,0.0001007581,0.0001794611,0.00007296251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003205427,0.002952059,0.1012118,0.00009906277,0.0001870196,0.0001110468,0.0004575888,0.001029865,0.8785848,0.0001480189,0.0001069886,0.01190629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002129435,0.02120352,0.3608814,0.000007010603,0.0003829502,0.0001719737,0.0005682952,0.004046828,0.6103237,0.0001847408,0.00195719,0.00005942204],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99896,0.00003121398,0.0006110676,0.00000694242,0.000002720571,0.00003503333,0.0001072056,0.000004183544,0.0002415329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954672,0.0001412133,0.002463916,0.00002376649,0.000005702359,0.0002150748,0.0006694412,0.00000835362,0.001005363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009009328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01791376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03235427748765574,"score_gpt":0.2555052866045922,"score_spread":0.2231510091169364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}