{"id":"W2073718745","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.100.193001","title":"Physical Interpretation of the “Kinetic Energy Release” Effect in the Double Photoionization of<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Photoionization; Physics; Atomic physics; Kinetic energy; Interpretation (philosophy); Polarization (electrochemistry); Coupling (piping); Photoionization mode; Energy (signal processing); Electron; Ionization; Quantum mechanics; Ion; Materials science; Chemistry; Physical chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003115177,0.0005686957,0.0001956581,0.0003523546,0.000409561,0.0004856347,0.0007816822,0.0004027501,0.009623022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005246634,0.0002325081,0.0004096055,0.0002075314,0.001308474,0.0007922982,0.0007357179,0.0007099971,0.0005055264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003397187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001738678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004220669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002860348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998958,0.00001748663,0.000003364666,0.00003299266,0.00002820558,0.00002210302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997607,0.0001077452,0.00004314136,0.00004946031,0.00001809772,0.00002089503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001189324,0.0002076872,0.005611144,0.0004433412,0.00006944672,0.002960882,0.0005765932,0.1359886,0.6308404,0.1951869,0.001954696,0.02497108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002001821,0.0006829078,0.02948771,0.00002664191,0.00006957653,0.002918337,0.0003755793,0.5370873,0.3619079,0.06339563,0.003699634,0.000148642],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7885956,0.0007727937,0.1507793,0.001117767,0.0002293689,0.0000771554,0.0001921598,0.001314152,0.05692161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950512,0.0001392097,0.002848813,0.00005568847,0.000008707878,0.00001401467,0.00005319748,0.00005588766,0.001773326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009623022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00960100640884187,"score_gpt":0.2402167860407977,"score_spread":0.2306157796319558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}