{"id":"W2073910737","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.026","title":"Optimal average sample number of the SPRT chart for monitoring fraction nonconforming","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequential probability ratio test; CUSUM; Control chart; Chart; Statistics; X-bar chart; Sample size determination; Fraction (chemistry); Mathematics; Sequential analysis; Sequential sampling; Computer science; Control limits; Process (computing)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003153515,0.0008130164,0.001805723,0.001571069,0.0006912539,0.001668007,0.001272806,0.001118175,0.002143793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01605082,0.0003696664,0.0006015478,0.0008697846,0.0006647155,0.001773402,0.0006866202,0.001153993,0.0004205047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00108393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002303791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00396844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002728386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972805,0.0007403737,0.0001523321,0.0007696569,0.0008278131,0.0002293962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904343,0.004933939,0.0008734134,0.0008162413,0.002476071,0.0004661442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00447374,0.0004242458,0.01395643,0.0005154164,0.0001178327,0.0003231413,0.0002284724,0.4320282,0.0537931,0.01513228,0.004519781,0.4744874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002589001,0.000142658,0.001839621,0.00001180332,0.00001703371,0.0000631643,0.00001335844,0.9892512,0.006592306,0.001675546,0.0003452911,0.00002204128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08591183,0.0004996505,0.9098897,0.0001405104,0.00006289279,0.000113245,0.0003225752,0.001691993,0.001367587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6453639,0.000256794,0.3524429,0.00005323894,0.0001004917,0.0001466741,0.0005812893,0.0001344795,0.0009202698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00396844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01667762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2641701968267079,"score_gpt":0.5101998877720714,"score_spread":0.2460296909453634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}