{"id":"W2073976188","doi":"10.1177/1363459307074695","title":"lIlness as argumentation: a prolegomenon to the rhetorical study of contestable complaints","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Suspect; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Focus (optics); Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01494961,0.0007910497,0.00132458,0.006713297,0.007204571,0.01880245,0.002604094,0.008798312,0.004231057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02526341,0.000580008,0.001347933,0.004789727,0.07036091,0.02832886,0.006074081,0.007841816,0.0009622597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005689742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002901436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001718069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009281827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821154,0.01395102,0.0004660625,0.0009269647,0.00182703,0.0007135701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613684,0.03301119,0.002101108,0.001560211,0.001308255,0.0006508172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005388743,0.000004397837,0.0000553183,0.00003082532,0.000001817516,0.00004256767,0.004824407,0.0000775679,0.00003622542,0.9930459,0.000428663,0.001446937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009946344,0.0000106795,0.00008285954,0.00009841972,0.000004660802,0.0001251192,0.002120529,0.0006125505,0.00007772376,0.9776677,0.01917864,0.0000110087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04304827,0.03489862,0.3326087,0.1427089,0.001941675,0.0002021239,0.000206821,0.0002520743,0.4441328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231114,0.007629943,0.04373991,0.00727311,0.003341652,0.000347168,0.00009059752,0.0001909918,0.01427519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07906199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.115086338046393,"score_gpt":0.4750521412026166,"score_spread":0.3599658031562236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}