{"id":"W2073979258","doi":"10.1118/1.4881142","title":"Optimizing cone beam CT scatter estimation in <b> <tt>egs_cbct</tt> </b> for a clinical and virtual chest phantom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"H. Lundbeck A/S; Odense Universitetshospital; Lundbeckfonden; Strategiske Forskningsråd","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Cone beam ct; Cone beam computed tomography; Nuclear medicine; Medical imaging; Dosimetry; Medical physics; Image-guided radiation therapy; Computed tomography; Medicine; Physics; Radiology; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005946185,0.0006393717,0.0001706626,0.0003253356,0.0001504988,0.0005075294,0.0004012643,0.0003666409,0.0008436876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001567923,0.0002329676,0.0002521632,0.0002432108,0.0001894493,0.0002551326,0.0002702892,0.0001934095,0.0003123674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008086439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002935336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003877345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998289,0.00005053344,0.00001068241,0.00002544303,0.00007155676,0.00001285628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996909,0.0001425245,0.00004321329,0.00002741721,0.00008345514,0.00001253151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394785,0.0001880681,0.008299628,0.0002249632,0.00004709143,0.0002596781,0.0001828421,0.6730623,0.2390097,0.002189981,0.001378754,0.07476219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003106206,0.0001139607,0.003377471,0.00002159216,0.00002478435,0.0001599091,0.00002439229,0.8748105,0.1195829,0.0005008542,0.001330948,0.00002171064],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3271678,0.000263972,0.6660194,0.0001862499,0.00001724842,0.0001372214,0.0002103579,0.002400539,0.003597206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7691962,0.0001248771,0.2287674,0.00007655442,0.000003888792,0.0000857979,0.0002795432,0.0004733468,0.0009925243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002935336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005836546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02668214365566033,"score_gpt":0.3274734489939693,"score_spread":0.3007913053383089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}