{"id":"W2073988666","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.017","title":"Managing invasive species: Rules of thumb for rapid assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Rule of thumb; Damages; Usability; Control (management); Invasive species; Balance (ability); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Political science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03058643,0.002978372,0.00351474,0.005192244,0.002543268,0.008825392,0.005267177,0.005298245,0.006155316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1125286,0.001140373,0.001535492,0.002455777,0.002165973,0.007836157,0.002538477,0.005356572,0.003631008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002468774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004276797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004006456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872848,0.005515017,0.001506249,0.001044757,0.004283515,0.0003655292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434593,0.0355765,0.005444998,0.004084748,0.01018645,0.001248011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003382165,0.0005462639,0.02301358,0.001639956,0.0008505,0.0006468566,0.0005637498,0.2365981,0.002450956,0.1051331,0.06286043,0.5653584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001834076,0.0002350732,0.00677714,0.001880277,0.0004748478,0.001056857,0.0007678056,0.4023628,0.002344216,0.5581771,0.02547022,0.0002702875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02026585,0.002832636,0.9455287,0.006814392,0.0004019433,0.001342812,0.0009003236,0.001474717,0.02043853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1660504,0.001422649,0.8279437,0.0008959934,0.0001946041,0.001252532,0.0005327566,0.0002294432,0.001477935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03058643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1617585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01956002508314583,"score_gpt":0.2446468979535231,"score_spread":0.2250868728703772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}