{"id":"W2074574297","doi":"10.1142/s0218195905001762","title":"SEPARATING POINT SETS IN POLYGONAL ENVIRONMENTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Geodesic; Polygon (computer graphics); Combinatorics; Chord (peer-to-peer); Point (geometry); Path (computing); Set (abstract data type); Pairwise comparison; Algorithm; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007252448,0.0002049103,0.0002465515,0.001240227,0.0001135846,0.0002161635,0.00134265,0.00007888176,0.00009630375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005921969,0.0002178856,0.0001750126,0.0009512628,0.00005447066,0.001390319,0.0002105044,0.0003184257,0.000147043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000360979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002788446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003688272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004172779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968966,0.00008933119,0.001107714,0.0003423029,0.00131731,0.000246762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980237,0.0004162737,0.0006655183,0.0002089487,0.0005236841,0.0001618184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002830725,0.0005315439,0.001003084,0.000004914653,0.000112529,0.00001883472,0.0002061028,0.7062456,0.000584099,0.05410517,0.0006213049,0.2365385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004417719,0.0002642025,0.05314512,0.0001141079,0.00003930346,0.00169039,0.000130262,0.4075621,0.002644547,0.159029,0.3700002,0.0009630382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02371017,0.0005423052,0.9697262,0.004370653,0.0003640899,0.0002685539,0.00001788223,0.00002993792,0.0009702125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763145,0.00004186135,0.2216939,0.0009355647,0.0007574446,0.00005187541,0.00005863131,0.00001193599,0.0001342741],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7526043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8885115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01080764953202885,"score_gpt":0.2926302831839573,"score_spread":0.2818226336519284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}