{"id":"W2074798930","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.036","title":"The influence of fish feed pellets on the stability of seabed sediment: A laboratory flume investigation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"University of Southampton","keywords":"Pellets; Flume; Sediment; Seabed; Settling; Environmental science; Benthic zone; Erosion; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Fishery; Oceanography; Environmental engineering; Geomorphology; Biology; Mechanics; Flow (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00206001,0.0001113339,0.0001190628,0.00002077704,0.0004995282,0.00002737987,0.0003618901,0.00002070063,0.00006544293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004632371,0.00005719835,0.00002760519,0.000679757,0.003820861,0.0001894254,0.0006146316,0.0001136974,0.000007021439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002554609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003528666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006143422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008063542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985927,0.00004250348,0.0002551583,0.0002612888,0.0006068316,0.0002415086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991903,0.0002556619,0.0001347453,0.0002593155,0.0000768489,0.00008315577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007287524,0.0001013249,0.5506365,0.00002620998,0.00001013964,0.000001523465,0.004012235,0.0001128968,0.4370565,0.00286503,0.0006025134,0.004502231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182609,0.0001417968,0.9318609,0.00001347154,0.000005251683,6.724003e-7,0.0007642239,0.00006738259,0.06476876,0.0004597581,0.001723094,0.00007640794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903047,0.00001096476,0.000005440078,0.001511607,0.00003704074,0.0001962459,0.000004866978,0.000009444372,0.007919684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999346,0.0000237376,0.0000565368,0.0003197694,0.00001224966,0.000004456569,5.759955e-7,0.000002594628,0.0002340356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3812244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009013769754984406,"score_gpt":0.2175822792088342,"score_spread":0.2085685094538497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}