{"id":"W2074834623","doi":"10.1002/fut.20353","title":"Estimation of physical intensity models for default risk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Futures Markets","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Credit risk; Econometrics; Context (archaeology); Mean reversion; Default risk; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Credit spread (options); Generalized method of moments; Economics; Bond; Intensity (physics); Term (time); Estimation; Mathematics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Stochastic process; Finance; Panel data; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006319884,0.0004144291,0.0009505076,0.001510014,0.0002199538,0.001642073,0.001286277,0.00134269,0.002567982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02758181,0.0005690568,0.0008505195,0.0008863047,0.000889445,0.001877467,0.001137134,0.001374033,0.0003592162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008201204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005328529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002770385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00154373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984383,0.0007925727,0.00007692013,0.0003226488,0.0002197814,0.0001498136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869227,0.009047408,0.002276252,0.0009044081,0.0004523345,0.0003968046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002140657,0.000194103,0.07351749,0.00005769648,0.0001739978,0.0001871685,0.0001932237,0.8251317,0.001398607,0.06764144,0.0007357796,0.03055476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001815386,0.00003419555,0.01085709,0.000009145789,0.00001054203,0.00003483087,0.00002139225,0.9654967,0.000192974,0.02315108,0.0001607603,0.00001319405],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146073,0.0001669338,0.2817298,0.0003214998,0.00001065881,0.00008837831,0.0002895263,0.0002236224,0.002562401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902913,0.00007308616,0.008601246,0.00002069927,0.00001570707,0.00003860597,0.0002909173,0.00001337761,0.0006550339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006319884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03342313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02707902228525234,"score_gpt":0.234234232988598,"score_spread":0.2071552107033457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}