{"id":"W2074834623","doi":"10.1002/fut.20353","title":"Estimation of physical intensity models for default risk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Futures Markets","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Credit risk; Econometrics; Context (archaeology); Mean reversion; Default risk; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Credit spread (options); Generalized method of moments; Economics; Bond; Intensity (physics); Term (time); Estimation; Mathematics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Stochastic process; Finance; Panel data; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003753937,0.00007712891,0.0003742472,0.0001625848,0.0001111942,0.000008214671,0.0001140484,0.0000605111,0.000009627347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004440881,0.00007360661,0.0002784374,0.0001034749,0.00004900655,0.0002375051,0.0000153025,0.0001289918,0.000002786238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003854219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003026171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000245344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004015431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992056,0.000008985203,0.0005340862,0.00009218336,0.00005249229,0.0001065929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986145,0.0001146976,0.0009428217,0.0001164027,0.0001618411,0.00004974786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004038753,0.001894368,0.1230278,0.0002277226,0.000673783,0.00003487672,0.01078641,0.3090398,0.0002361317,0.2788653,0.08190077,0.1892743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007445433,0.0002027208,0.5573589,0.00002139566,0.00002445597,0.00003841331,0.00003902222,0.2830197,0.0001569253,0.1546558,0.003624172,0.0001139665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8671927,0.0005360627,0.1307499,0.0001069077,0.0004172982,0.00008560959,0.00009033091,0.000003857494,0.0008173963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947838,0.0002690611,0.0043526,0.00000921245,0.0005097733,0.000001957599,0.000003460716,0.000008901538,0.00006123196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4343311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3001591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02707902228525234,"score_gpt":0.234234232988598,"score_spread":0.2071552107033457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}