{"id":"W2074852759","doi":"10.1289/ehp.0010883","title":"Strategies for assessing the implications of malformed frogs for environmental health.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Environmental health; Environmental hazard; Multidisciplinary approach; Human health; Hazard; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental protection; Ecology; Biology; Medicine; Political science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006858428,0.0003388022,0.0004618972,0.0000475074,0.001578013,0.00003739984,0.0004474914,0.0001559787,0.007565001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009656032,0.000291435,0.0002375593,0.0001079289,0.00155444,0.0004915177,0.0001216182,0.0002390036,0.0001405456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00141658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000635818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006468407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001038781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972553,0.0002025414,0.0006931637,0.0007394358,0.0002367511,0.0008728034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985388,0.0003577291,0.0003833789,0.0004893839,0.000001052437,0.0002296422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001386766,0.01586192,0.1519817,0.0005139272,0.0006263902,0.000003555119,0.07557332,0.01304764,0.09308413,0.01083886,0.067863,0.5692188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003702964,0.003828572,0.7094329,0.00004147012,0.00006493918,0.00007186466,0.08289385,0.001221578,0.001990461,0.01172843,0.1840894,0.0009336062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643883,0.002240564,0.00415097,0.01471808,0.0001738729,0.00527081,0.001075587,0.0000732953,0.007908545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849335,0.001127194,0.00758541,0.002439349,0.00008139791,0.00102489,0.0001601835,0.00005577869,0.0025923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5682852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02191509895710511,"score_gpt":0.334505334963019,"score_spread":0.3125902360059138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}