{"id":"W2074901169","doi":"10.1080/14616718.2013.840112","title":"Resilience and housing choices among Filipino immigrants in Toronto","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Housing Policy","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Immigration; Census; Metropolitan area; Psychological resilience; Renting; Demographic economics; Settlement (finance); Population; Flexibility (engineering); Descriptive statistics; Rental housing; Resilience (materials science); Geography; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003941336,0.00009129689,0.000166918,0.0002306724,0.0001939378,0.0002480642,0.0003051994,0.00005340449,0.00009364312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006405355,0.00008109968,0.00005374808,0.0001434341,0.0002644556,0.001305296,0.00005419677,0.0001137974,0.000005282808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004620839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002008093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2091734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07900307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986149,0.0001030402,0.0003815138,0.0001117881,0.0005728322,0.0002159439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989071,0.0001945493,0.0003149229,0.00005400699,0.0004296017,0.00009982738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003393906,0.0001041436,0.8980175,0.000006771842,0.000104697,0.00003216234,0.04076798,0.0001182295,0.0005570016,0.004734989,0.001530989,0.05399155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007528569,0.00004683234,0.9711512,0.0002425847,0.00001173928,0.00001374275,0.0179159,0.000244617,0.0001300591,0.00230729,0.006987049,0.0001960751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841254,0.0007870186,0.0001096215,0.002973937,0.0005681409,0.0000800937,0.000002024026,0.00001387293,0.01133994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966378,0.001042084,0.0003639981,0.0003426461,0.001187713,0.000001962702,2.674181e-7,0.000007708843,0.0004158258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1301703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9378027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01727781066301408,"score_gpt":0.3413509387789221,"score_spread":0.324073128115908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}