{"id":"W2074957854","doi":"10.1186/1471-2156-10-84","title":"A simple method for estimating genetic diversity in large populations from finite sample sizes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Species richness; Genetic diversity; Population; Rarefaction (ecology); Coalescent theory; Statistics; Sample size determination; Estimator; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Mathematics; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001327261,0.0001746297,0.00018069,0.00006276611,0.0002789188,0.00003282255,0.0002424962,0.0001907848,0.00006050114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003604784,0.0002005293,0.0001156116,0.0001215159,0.00001780514,0.000003831165,0.0002162343,0.00006937962,0.000003807221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001509543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004622017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001807789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00125669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988408,0.00007878955,0.0002539613,0.0003930777,0.0001250963,0.0003082695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992753,0.0001132367,0.0001051573,0.0003361751,0.00008024397,0.00008983067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241805,0.0001128173,0.7032076,0.000023285,0.00003177146,0.000001276319,0.0005684077,0.2707871,0.01003437,0.0001938779,0.0009417698,0.01397355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001694244,0.0002222199,0.8316242,0.000009161932,0.00007474602,0.000001280717,0.0001746566,0.1388608,0.00245939,0.0182658,0.006228385,0.0003851577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4522141,0.0001955054,0.5467498,0.00002952995,0.0001183533,0.000212588,0.0004400162,0.00001033908,0.00002979437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5278283,0.000009120159,0.4711396,0.0002397363,0.0001418871,0.000003613119,0.0006013137,0.000007471259,0.00002893182],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.817735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05383765223722078,"score_gpt":0.3212100844392131,"score_spread":0.2673724322019924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}