{"id":"W2075001222","doi":"10.2166/wst.2006.291","title":"Historical climate and stream flow trends and future water demand analysis in the Calgary region, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Population growth; Per capita; Environmental science; Population; Water resources; Resource (disambiguation); Water supply; Water resource management; Sustainability; Water use; Geography; Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental engineering; Ecology; Drainage basin; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003160666,0.0001957409,0.000219527,0.001347621,0.0009828175,0.001081874,0.0007047286,0.0002983294,0.001645393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008366729,0.0002241858,0.0003517465,0.003965026,0.0003270831,0.0003906469,0.0003462109,0.0004054095,0.0002198108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02449362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01189769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997768,0.00001627378,0.00001132254,0.00003754057,0.00007600794,0.00008201396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00004915145,0.0000424527,0.00001435138,0.0003651328,0.00007369224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009904303,0.00006925391,0.9383291,0.00008066745,0.000150387,0.0003751422,0.001002641,0.02917095,0.0004809427,0.001109852,0.006056386,0.02307554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008428226,0.00001669605,0.9666462,0.00003105558,0.0000464572,0.00005489681,0.002211159,0.0258793,0.0002340932,0.0001620364,0.004683156,0.00002637348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889907,0.0003174536,0.0002774872,0.0003280834,0.000007580268,0.00001533672,0.006861473,0.00002995119,0.003171921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922274,0.0004908725,0.0004826825,0.00004182521,0.000003835299,0.000009182603,0.004896807,0.00001147669,0.001835936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02449362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1777145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00323016993829502,"score_gpt":0.1739348596441451,"score_spread":0.1707046897058501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}