{"id":"W2075129459","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00071.x","title":"Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Business; Opportunity cost; Stakeholder; Marine spatial planning; Environmental planning; Marine protected area; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004269518,0.0001399461,0.0002538237,0.00005238953,0.0001049022,0.00004866481,0.0002950588,0.00003795257,0.0003621879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000139873,0.0001370074,0.00002493474,0.0001163989,0.00005271211,0.0004633481,0.0003004458,0.00009694618,0.0005195564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002186911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001376735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00550099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002663754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987995,0.00008106543,0.0004355308,0.0003322657,0.0001450285,0.0002066194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992506,0.0001296448,0.0001911858,0.0003803268,0.000007393183,0.0000408876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002900649,0.0000346352,0.9601648,0.0002403894,0.00001333655,0.0000199136,0.0003167611,0.0001591097,0.002301298,0.00009612566,0.03529413,0.001330463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005578198,0.00003226259,0.9747507,0.0002563657,0.00001889406,0.00001231261,0.0001166139,0.0208965,0.00003237433,0.0002787718,0.00283428,0.0002130908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602386,0.0000149039,0.0007997432,0.03627527,0.0001671621,0.0007071982,0.000005973001,0.00005396602,0.001737127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783693,0.000005252775,0.0002651547,0.020856,0.00005009361,0.0000468947,0.0001339364,0.000007497067,0.000265887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03245984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8315889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03038828360293219,"score_gpt":0.2550116273956862,"score_spread":0.224623343792754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}