{"id":"W2075164759","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.050","title":"A Great Lakes Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring network: Evaluation and design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Ministry of Environment; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Environmental science; Deposition (geology); Environmental monitoring; Air monitoring; Physical geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Geology; Environmental engineering; Sediment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01630974,0.001337906,0.0007187161,0.001781838,0.001010688,0.001675563,0.002149534,0.000857349,0.004352308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01767211,0.0007119143,0.0006880206,0.001963243,0.0009961411,0.00156977,0.002054703,0.000581239,0.0007479107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00599221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007530751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01527271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01477394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861893,0.008435343,0.0006330364,0.000986947,0.003028202,0.0007271317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860643,0.002892249,0.001283766,0.001011277,0.007547503,0.001200917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009492582,0.006043971,0.1348089,0.002128414,0.0003696848,0.0009739063,0.0006975916,0.4259848,0.01436611,0.008904635,0.01591552,0.3803139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005028653,0.01695795,0.06917297,0.0002541582,0.0006406255,0.0003775879,0.001846335,0.8540526,0.02080888,0.003176852,0.02747718,0.0002062681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6760622,0.0003567082,0.2246862,0.0007985494,0.0001311354,0.07353289,0.004810311,0.001450009,0.01817191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595741,0.0004535827,0.3261763,0.0002608201,0.00008506456,0.06225653,0.006713629,0.0001893403,0.008123647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08625519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02492660257648581,"score_gpt":0.2450030897069837,"score_spread":0.2200764871304979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}